Seminar entitled “International Responsibility for Violating the National Sovereignty of an Independent State in the Faculty of Law”, Karbala University
The Department of Quality Assurance at the Faculty of Law – Karbala University held a panel discussion on “International Responsibility for Violating the National Sovereignty of the Independent State” on Sunday 31/3/2019 and on the Justice Hall in the College. The UN Security Council is composed of 15 members. The resolution needs to be approved by (9) members, provided that the five permanent members agree and one of the countries The five permanent members m If the veto is used, the question is whether a state can violate the sovereignty of another country. Yes, but it can bear the consequences of international law, as happened to Iraq during its invasion of Kuwait. The United Nations Charter in paragraph (3.4) It is permissible to use force to resolve disputes between states. The United Nations or the UN Security Council, as happened to Iraq under Article VII, may also be used. In the United Nations there are so-called conflicting arms between States: the International Court of Justice and the Security Council. The establishment of courts without approval The opponents of states and the people of this court are the moral persons of any state while the International Criminal Court punishes the natural persons who committed the crimes in those countries. There are, inter alia, the work of the criminal court, for example, whether this state is a member of the criminal court Recourse to the UN Security Council and if the Security Council is unable to resort to the General Assembly of the United Nations and this General Assembly includes all the 193 independent states and represent all their will and the Security Council did not resort to the use of force, as in Chapter VII, The sixth chapter calls for resolving disputes between countries through negotiations and agreements in a peaceful manner, such as good intentions, good offices and others. Another weakness in the Security Council is that it is difficult to resort to the Security Council if the aggressor state is a great state and Security Council members, since that state has the right to veto and can veto decisions, but the law remains the law and the separation that the adversaries resort to to recover the stolen rights of states and to hold the international responsibility of the aggressor States for violating the national sovereignty of the states Then, he went on to talk to AHD Ahmed Shaker and said that the jurisdiction of international law was found with the existence of sovereignty and where the seriousness of sovereignty found violation and where the violation found and the grandeur of sovereignty, without the sovereignty of States and their right to sovereignty there is no violation and that most of the characters of international law are individuals The history of the Golan Heights, which were restored by Syria (1976) and in general, is a map showing the geographical area of Syria’s borders, including the Golan Heights. 1980 Esr And the American decision to enforce the Israeli laws on the Golan has been condemned by the Security Council resolution by a resolution of the Security Council, the resolution in force (497) for 1981 and refer this resolution to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, which emphasizes the sovereignty of States on its territory and in our talk on the subject of Trump decision we have to We know what its adaptation to international law is, acting out of unilateral will and unilateral action, which creates an obligation on the part of its author and does not create an obligation on other States. This resolution violates the common will of the Member States, As in resolution 497, and the common will is higher than that of individual will and who clings to the subject of the loss of sovereignty of States, the legal personality is not affected by the lack of sovereignty. Parts of its territories are occupied. Resolution 497 is the current decision. Dr. Hassan Ali Kazem opened the door of interventions saying that the international community now and the world is governed by the one pole, America at this stage. It can do what it wants and the prevailing logic of force. It also has a great influence on UN Security Council resolutions, especially after the end of the bipolar system and the disintegration of the Soviet Union. How can the Security Council be entitled to the right of the conflicting countries if they come under American pressure? The answer was that in our lecture exhibition, the law is the law and the political opinions are changing by changing the power centers and then subject to a set of questions by the present members of the faculty of law and graduate students. Discussed and answered to end this episode amid the desire of the attendees to establish more of these seminars and seminars that provide the recipient with scientific and legal information may be absent from them.
